feat: SMEM-P with make_tiled_copy_tv + partition_S

This commit is contained in:
2026-05-24 03:19:10 +00:00
parent b471579140
commit e6ed497bdd

View File

@@ -366,39 +366,45 @@ class FmhaKernel:
cute.copy(tiled_tmem_store, rP_words, tTMEM_STOREtP)
cute.arch.fence_view_async_tmem_store()
else:
# SMEM-P: write P to sP using a TiledCopy derived from PV MMA's
# A-operand layout, but with softmax thread mapping.
# SMEM-P: write P to sP using make_tiled_copy_tv.
#
# Strategy: Use the PV MMA's A-operand SMEM layout (which matches sP)
# and create a new TiledCopy with softmax thread/value layout.
# The softmax threads (128 total) each own one row of P.
# Within each row, values are in sP's subtiled format.
# The TMEM-load copy partitions 128 softmax threads across the
# 128×128 P matrix. We use the SAME thread layout (one thread
# per row) but map values to sP's subtiled address space.
#
# We use pv_mma's make_tiled_copy_A to get the copy atom and tiling,
# then override the thread layout for the softmax threads.
_smem_p_tiled_copy = utils.sm100.make_tiled_copy_A(
# Thread layout: (128,) stride (1,) — 128 threads, one per P row
# Value layout: (16, 4, 2) stride (1, 16, 8192) — sP's k-subtiling
# This gives atom_layout_tv: (tid, k0, k1, k2) → 64*tid + k0 + 16*k1 + 8192*k2
# Which matches sP's logical layout: sP_addr(m, k0, k1, k2) = 64*m + k0 + 16*k1 + 8192*k2
_smem_p_atom = cute.make_copy_atom(
cute.nvgpu.CopyUniversalOp(),
pv_mma, self.q_dtype,
128, # tiler_mn - matches the P matrix tile size
self.q_dtype,
num_bits_per_copy=16,
)
# Get the softmax thread's partition
_thr_smem_p = _smem_p_tiled_copy.get_slice(sfw_idx)
# Create a logical (non-swizzled) view of sP for partitioning
_sP_logical = cute.make_tensor(_sP_nostage.iterator, _sP_nostage.layout)
_tRS_sP = _thr_smem_p.partition_D(_sP_logical)
# Create source register tensor matching the copy's value order
_tRS_rP = cute.make_rmem_tensor(_tRS_sP.shape, self.q_dtype)
# Fill _tRS_rP from rP_bf16.
# rP_bf16 is in TMEM-load order: ((32,1),4,1,1) with 128 values
# _tRS_rP is in copy value order. We need to map between them.
# For the copy, each thread should own P[thread_row, :].
# rP_bf16[(j0,0),j1,0,0] = P[thread_row, j0+32*j1]
# We need to figure out the copy's value order for our thread.
# PRINT THE SHAPES to understand the mapping
# For now, fill with zeros as a baseline test
for v_idx in cutlass.range(cute.size(_tRS_rP), vectorize=True):
_tRS_rP[v_idx] = BFloat16(0.0)
cute.copy(_smem_p_tiled_copy, _tRS_rP, _tRS_sP)
_smem_p_thr_layout = cute.make_layout((128,), stride=(1,))
_smem_p_val_layout = cute.make_layout((16, 4, 2), stride=(1, 16, 8192))
_tiled_smem_p = cute.make_tiled_copy_tv(
_smem_p_atom, _smem_p_thr_layout, _smem_p_val_layout,
)
_thr_smem_p = _tiled_smem_p.get_slice(sfw_idx)
# Create source register tensor in copy's value order
# The partition_D gives us the sP partition for this thread
# We need a matching source tensor
_tAS_sP = _thr_smem_p.partition_S(_sP_nostage)
_tAS_rP = cute.make_rmem_tensor(_tAS_sP.shape, self.q_dtype)
# Fill _tAS_rP from rP_bf16.
# rP_bf16 is in TMEM-load register order: ((32,1),4,1,1)
# Each thread owns row sfw_idx of the P matrix.
# rP_bf16[(j0,0),j1,0,0] = P[sfw_idx, j0+32*j1]
# The copy's value layout maps (k0,k1,k2) to P[sfw_idx, k0+16*k1+64*k2]
# So P[sfw_idx, k] where k = k0+16*k1+64*k2 = j0+32*j1
# We need to fill _tAS_rP[k0,k1,k2] = rP_bf16[(k%32,0), k//32, 0, 0]
# But _tAS_rP's shape is determined by partition_S, which might be
# different from (16,4,2). We need to figure out the actual shape.
# For now, zero-fill as baseline, then we'll fill properly.
for v_idx in cutlass.range(cute.size(_tAS_rP), vectorize=True):
_tAS_rP[v_idx] = BFloat16(0.0)
cute.copy(_tiled_smem_p, _tAS_rP, _tAS_sP)
cute.arch.fence_proxy("async.shared", space="cta")
if kt > 0:
for i in range(n_corr_tiles):