Update CURRENT_BUG.md: Bug 25 (swiglu_limit), shared expert path verification, variable padded offsets
This commit is contained in:
158
CURRENT_BUG.md
158
CURRENT_BUG.md
@@ -1,21 +1,17 @@
|
||||
# Current Bug: CuTeDSLMoERunner — Status & Debug History
|
||||
|
||||
## Current Status (May 17, 2026 16:52 UTC)
|
||||
## Current Status (May 17, 2026 17:54 UTC)
|
||||
|
||||
**vLLM runs, cudagraph capture succeeds, but model output is empty/invisible tokens (garbage logits). Going back to layer tests to debug GEMM output quality.**
|
||||
**Build #11 in progress (includes swiglu_limit fix). Previous builds produced empty/invisible token output.**
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ `layertest.py` — 0.988 cosine (with dynamic gs reference)
|
||||
- ✅ `layertest.py` — 0.988 cosine
|
||||
- ✅ `cudagraph_test.py` — capture + replay works
|
||||
- ✅ Container builds, loads weights, warmup gs computed (no L2 gs=0)
|
||||
- ✅ With `--gpu_memory_utilization=0.9` and `max_cudagraph_capture_size=8`, container starts and serves
|
||||
- ❌ Model output is empty content (30 tokens of invisible/BS token) — MoE GEMM output is wrong
|
||||
- ✅ vLLM container starts, loads weights, warmup gs computed, cudagraph capture succeeds
|
||||
- ❌ Model output was empty content (30 invisible tokens) — **swiglu_limit fix not yet tested in container**
|
||||
|
||||
**Next step:** Debug WHY the runner produces 0.988 cosine in layertest but garbage in vLLM. Likely issues:
|
||||
1. The warmup gs values (computed from random data) don't match real runtime activation magnitudes
|
||||
2. The scale assembly layout is subtly wrong for 48 experts vs 3 experts in the test
|
||||
3. The padded buffer scatter (clamped_local) is dropping real token data
|
||||
**Latest fix: Missing swiglu_limit=10.0 activation clamping (Bug 25).** DeepSeek-V4 uses `SiluAndMulWithClamp(10.0)` which clamps `silu(gate)` to max 10.0 and `up` to [-10, 10]. Our runner was doing plain `F.silu(gate) * up` without clamping. Large gate values → unbounded SiLU output → corrupted L2 GEMM input → garbage logits → model outputs BOS/thinking tokens.
|
||||
|
||||
**Current vLLM launch config:**
|
||||
**vLLM launch config:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
--gpu_memory_utilization=0.9
|
||||
--compilation-config='{"cudagraph_mode": "FULL_DECODE_ONLY", "custom_ops": ["all"], "cudagraph_capture_sizes": [1, 2, 4, 8], "max_cudagraph_capture_size": 8}'
|
||||
@@ -23,7 +19,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Bugs Found & Fixed (1–21)
|
||||
## Bugs Found & Fixed
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug 1: Scale Assembly — Global vs Per-Expert Swizzle
|
||||
**Fix:** Two-phase scatter + per-expert swizzle.
|
||||
@@ -50,106 +46,141 @@
|
||||
**Fix:** Separate `_padded_x_sf_buf_l1`/`_l2`, separate per-expert bufs.
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug 8: Global→Local Expert ID Mismatch — CUDA_ERROR_ASSERT
|
||||
**Symptom:** `IndexKernel.cu:111` OOB, cascading CUDA_ERROR_ASSERT (710).
|
||||
**Root cause:** `topk_ids` contains global IDs (0-255), runner treated as local.
|
||||
**Fix:** `experts_start_idx`, remap global→local, mask non-local tokens.
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug 8b: `.cpu()` Sync Breaking Cudagraph
|
||||
**Fix:** `_token_indices` on GPU, `_fill_token_indices()` CPU→GPU copy.
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug 9: `padded_x_sf` Buffer Too Small
|
||||
**Fix:** Iterative — see Bugs 14, 16.
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug 10: Wrong `top_k`/`max_num_tokens` Defaults
|
||||
**Fix:** Pass from `deepseek_v4.py`.
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug 11: Full-Buffer Swizzle Wrong for GEMM
|
||||
**Fix:** Per-expert swizzle.
|
||||
### Bug 9–11: Buffer sizing and swizzle layout
|
||||
See previous versions for details.
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug 12: `torch.full()` During Cudagraph Capture
|
||||
**Symptom:** `cudaErrorStreamCaptureUnsupported`.
|
||||
**Fix:** Pre-allocated buffers, `.fill_()` instead of `torch.full()`.
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug 13: Warmup Passed Global Expert IDs
|
||||
**Symptom:** L2 gs=0.0 on EP5/EP7.
|
||||
**Fix:** Pass local IDs.
|
||||
**Fix:** Pass local IDs (0..num_experts-1).
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug 14: GEMM Scale Layout Mismatch — 128-Row Fixed vs Variable
|
||||
### Bug 14: GEMM Scale Layout Mismatch — Fixed 128-Row vs Variable
|
||||
**Symptom:** BOS token repeat (garbage logits).
|
||||
**Root cause:** Scale assembly at `e*128` offsets, GEMM reads by real `expert_offsets`. Expert with 500 tokens → GEMM reads 500 scale rows but only 128 have data.
|
||||
**Fix:** Fixed-layout padding: each expert gets `max_chunks * 128` rows. Pad `slot_hidden`. Pass `padded_expert_offsets` to GEMM. Extract via `l1_out[padded_dst]`.
|
||||
**Root cause:** Scale assembly at `e*128`, GEMM reads by real expert_offsets. Expert with 500 tokens → GEMM reads 500 scale rows but only 128 have data.
|
||||
**Fix:** Variable padded expert offsets, scatter into real padded positions.
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug 15: OOM — Per-Layer Padded Buffers (4.3 GB)
|
||||
**Root cause:** `padded_hidden_buf` + `padded_activated_buf` at 72 MB × 60 layers.
|
||||
**Root cause:** 72 MB × 60 layers = 4.3 GB. Not enough room for KV cache.
|
||||
**Fix:** Shared buffers (Bug 21).
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug 16: `padded_max_slots` Mismatch
|
||||
**Root cause:** Sized for `max_tokens*top_k` but needed `num_experts*max_chunks*128`.
|
||||
**Fix:** Size correctly.
|
||||
**Fix:** Size for `num_experts * max_chunks * 128`.
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug 17: Shape Mismatch (49152 vs 3072)
|
||||
**Root cause:** Cap `max_num_tokens` to 512 made buffers too small for 8192-token warmup.
|
||||
**Fix:** Reverted cap, use shared buffers (Bug 21).
|
||||
**Fix:** Reverted cap, use shared buffers.
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug 18–20: Cudagraph Capture Failures
|
||||
**Root cause:** Dynamic tensor allocation (`torch.zeros`), variable-trip loops, GPU scalars in Python control flow.
|
||||
### Bug 18–20: Cudagraph Capture Failures (dynamic allocs, variable loops, GPU scalars)
|
||||
**Fix:** Pre-allocate everything, fixed loop counts, Python constants for offsets.
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug 21: OOM (correct fix) — Shared Padded Buffers
|
||||
**Root cause:** Per-layer allocation of padded buffers.
|
||||
**Fix:** Class-level shared buffers dict keyed by device. Layers execute sequentially → safe to share. Also shared `padded_x_sf_buf` and `output_buf`. Total ~150 MB instead of ~4.3 GB.
|
||||
### Bug 21: OOM — Shared Padded Buffers
|
||||
**Fix:** Class-level shared buffers dict keyed by device. `padded_hidden`, `padded_activated`, `padded_xsf_l1`/`l2`, `output` all shared. ~150 MB total instead of ~4.3 GB.
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug 22: Token Dropping via `clamped_local`
|
||||
**Symptom:** Garbage model output (empty/invisible tokens).
|
||||
**Root cause:** `local_row.clamp(max=max_rows_per_expert-1)` silently dropped tokens when an expert got more than `max_chunks*128` tokens. `max_chunks` was computed as average (ceil(total_slots / (num_experts*128))), not worst-case. MoE routing is uneven — some experts get 200+ tokens while others get 10.
|
||||
**Fix:** Use real padded expert offsets (variable per expert, padded to 128). No clamping needed — each expert gets exactly the space it needs.
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug 23: cudaErrorStreamCaptureUnsupported from Dynamic GPU Slicing
|
||||
**Symptom:** All 8 workers fail during cudagraph capture.
|
||||
**Root cause:** `buf[:total_padded_slots]` where `total_padded_slots` is a GPU scalar — dynamic tensor slicing with a GPU index is a CUDA operation not permitted during stream capture.
|
||||
**Fix:** Use full pre-allocated buffers, no dynamic GPU slicing. Pass `x_sf[:num_slots]` (Python int) to scale assembly.
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug 24: Scale Assembly `.cpu().tolist()` Breaks Cudagraph
|
||||
**Symptom:** `cudaErrorStreamCaptureInvalidated` during capture.
|
||||
**Root cause:** Per-expert Python loops with GPU-derived offsets required `.cpu().tolist()` for slicing — CPU-GPU sync invalidates stream capture.
|
||||
**Fix:** Full-buffer Blackwell 32_4_4 swizzle. Apply `to_blocked` transform to entire `padded_x_sf` buffer at once. No CPU syncs, no Python loops. The buffer is already 128-row aligned per expert and 4-col aligned, so the full-buffer swizzle produces the correct layout. GEMM reads `scale_a` using `padded_expert_offsets`, matching the scatter layout.
|
||||
|
||||
### Bug 25: Missing `swiglu_limit=10.0` Activation Clamping — LIKELY CAUSE OF GARBAGE OUTPUT
|
||||
**Symptom:** Model generates 30 tokens of empty/invisible content (BOS or thinking token). Not meaningful text.
|
||||
**Root cause:** DeepSeek-V4 uses `SiluAndMulWithClamp(10.0)` which:
|
||||
- Clamps `silu(gate)` to max 10.0
|
||||
- Clamps `up` to [-10.0, 10.0]
|
||||
|
||||
Our runner did plain `F.silu(gate) * up` without clamping. Large gate values produce unbounded SiLU output (silu(20) ≈ 20, silu(50) ≈ 50). These large values get multiplied by the up projection, producing activations with amax >> 10. This:
|
||||
1. Corrupts the L2 GEMM input (quantized with wrong gs)
|
||||
2. Produces garbage L2 output
|
||||
3. Final logits are wrong → model collapses to most frequent token (BOS)
|
||||
|
||||
**Fix:** Added `set_swiglu_limit(limit)` to runner. In `run()`, apply clamping:
|
||||
```python
|
||||
gate_silu = F.silu(gate)
|
||||
if self._swiglu_limit is not None:
|
||||
gate_silu = gate_silu.clamp(max=self._swiglu_limit)
|
||||
up = up.clamp(min=-self._swiglu_limit, max=self._swiglu_limit)
|
||||
activated = gate_silu * up
|
||||
```
|
||||
Called from `deepseek_v4.py` after warmup: `self._cutedsl_runner.set_swiglu_limit(float(self.swiglu_limit))`.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Current Architecture: Fixed-Layout Padding
|
||||
## Current Architecture: Variable Padded Expert Offsets
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Each expert gets max_chunks * 128 rows at offset (e * max_chunks * 128).
|
||||
Each expert padded to next multiple of 128 tokens.
|
||||
padded_expert_offsets computed from real tokens_per_expert (GPU).
|
||||
|
||||
Scatter: padded_dst = expert_assign * max_rows_per_expert + clamped_local_row
|
||||
GEMM input: padded_hidden (total = num_experts * max_chunks * 128 rows)
|
||||
GEMM offsets: [0, max_rows, 2*max_rows, ...] (fixed, pre-computed)
|
||||
GEMM output: same total rows
|
||||
Extract: l1_out[padded_dst] → only real token rows
|
||||
Scatter: padded_dst = padded_expert_offsets[expert_assign] + local_row
|
||||
GEMM input: padded_hidden (full pre-allocated buffer, not sliced)
|
||||
GEMM offsets: padded_expert_offsets[1:] (GPU tensor)
|
||||
GEMM output: full buffer size; extract via l1_out[padded_dst]
|
||||
|
||||
Scale assembly:
|
||||
Phase 1: Scatter x_sf into padded_x_sf at same fixed offsets
|
||||
Phase 2: Per-expert, per-chunk swizzle (fixed loop: max_chunks iterations)
|
||||
No dynamic tensor allocation, no GPU→CPU syncs
|
||||
Phase 1: Scatter x_sf into padded_x_sf at padded_expert_offsets
|
||||
Phase 2: Full-buffer Blackwell 32_4_4 swizzle (no CPU syncs)
|
||||
Zero CPU syncs, zero Python loops
|
||||
|
||||
Shared buffers (class-level):
|
||||
Activation:
|
||||
SiLU(gate) clamped to swiglu_limit (10.0)
|
||||
up clamped to [-swiglu_limit, swiglu_limit]
|
||||
activated = clamped_silu * clamped_up
|
||||
|
||||
Shared buffers (class-level, ~150 MB total):
|
||||
padded_hidden, padded_activated, padded_xsf_l1, padded_xsf_l2, output
|
||||
~150 MB total (not per-layer)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Cudagraph Constraints (All Resolved)
|
||||
- No `.item()`, `.cpu()`, `.tolist()`
|
||||
- No `torch.zeros/ones/full/empty/arange()` during capture
|
||||
- No dynamic Python control flow from GPU values
|
||||
- Per-expert Python loops OK (fixed `num_experts`)
|
||||
- No `torch.zeros/ones/full/empty/arange()` during capture — pre-allocate everything
|
||||
- No dynamic GPU slicing (`buf[:gpu_scalar]`) — use full buffers
|
||||
- No Python loops with GPU-derived values — full-buffer ops instead
|
||||
- No `torch.full()` — pre-allocated `.fill_()`
|
||||
- Shared buffers OK (layers sequential during capture and replay)
|
||||
- `F.silu().clamp()` and `.clamp()` are GPU ops — cudagraph-safe ✅
|
||||
|
||||
### EP Configuration (DeepSeek-V4-Pro on 8×B200)
|
||||
- 256 total experts, top_k=6
|
||||
- EP=8 → 48 local experts per rank
|
||||
- 256 total experts, top_k=6, swiglu_limit=10.0
|
||||
- EP=8 → 48 local experts per rank (n_routed_experts / ep_size = 256/8 = 32, but logs show 48)
|
||||
- `experts_start_idx` = rank × 32
|
||||
- `max_num_tokens` = 8192
|
||||
- `max_chunks_per_expert` = ceil(8192 × 6 / (48 × 128)) = 8
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Outstanding Issue: Garbage Model Output
|
||||
## Shared Expert Path (verified correct)
|
||||
|
||||
**Symptom:** Model generates 30 tokens of empty/invisible content (BOS or thinking token). Not meaningful text.
|
||||
```
|
||||
DeepseekV4MoE.forward():
|
||||
1. gate → fused_topk_bias → topk_weights, topk_ids
|
||||
2. self.experts(hidden_states, topk_weights, topk_ids) → routed_output
|
||||
3. EP all-reduce across ranks
|
||||
4. self.shared_experts(hidden_states) → shared_output
|
||||
5. final = routed_output + shared_output
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**What works:** layertest gives 0.988 cosine with 3 experts, 8 tokens, top_k=8.
|
||||
|
||||
**What doesn't:** vLLM with 48 experts, variable tokens, top_k=6 produces garbage.
|
||||
|
||||
**Hypotheses to investigate:**
|
||||
1. **Warmup gs from random data ≠ real activation magnitudes.** The warmup uses `torch.randn` (amax ~3) but real activations have amax ~8-10. The gs values would be wrong, causing quantization errors.
|
||||
2. **Scale assembly with 48 experts × 8 chunks.** With max_chunks=8 and 48 experts, there are 384 swizzle blocks. The fixed-layout scatter with `clamped_local` may be dropping tokens that overflow the expert's max_rows section.
|
||||
3. **`clamped_local = local_row.clamp(max=max_rows_per_expert - 1)`.** If an expert has more than `max_chunks*128` real tokens, overflow tokens all map to the same row, overwriting each other. This silently drops data.
|
||||
4. **The `_needs_token_refill` path.** After GEMM JIT, `_token_indices` may get corrupted. The refill happens AFTER the first run, but the first run already used corrupted indices.
|
||||
- Shared experts: `DeepseekV4MLP` (not NVFP4, uses standard quantization)
|
||||
- `routed_scaling_factor`: Applied in `fused_topk_bias` to topk_weights ✅
|
||||
- `renormalize`: Top-k weights normalized to sum to 1 ✅
|
||||
- `scoring_func=sqrtsoftplus`: Applied in routing ✅
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -159,9 +190,6 @@ Shared buffers (class-level):
|
||||
|------|---------|
|
||||
| `tests/layertest.py` | Reference vs runner, 3 experts. Must pass ≥0.98 cosine. |
|
||||
| `tests/cudagraph_test.py` | Cudagraph capture + replay. Must pass. |
|
||||
| `tests/test_runner_vs_pipeline.py` | Runner vs pipeline comparison. |
|
||||
| `tests/test_scale_assembly.py` | Scale assembly comparison. |
|
||||
| `tests/test_warmup_gs.py` | Warmup gs computation. |
|
||||
|
||||
**Run order after any code change:**
|
||||
1. `python3 tests/layertest.py` — must pass
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user