[Docs] Switch to better markdown linting pre-commit hook (#21851)

Signed-off-by: Harry Mellor <19981378+hmellor@users.noreply.github.com>

.buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/README.md

@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ See [vLLM performance dashboard](https://perf.vllm.ai) for the latest performanc
 ## Trigger the benchmark
 
 Performance benchmark will be triggered when:
+
 - A PR being merged into vllm.
 - Every commit for those PRs with `perf-benchmarks` label AND `ready` label.
 
@@ -38,6 +39,7 @@ bash .buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/scripts/run-performance-benchmarks.sh
 ```
 
 Runtime environment variables:
+
 - `ON_CPU`: set the value to '1' on Intel® Xeon® Processors. Default value is 0.
 - `SERVING_JSON`: JSON file to use for the serving tests. Default value is empty string (use default file).
 - `LATENCY_JSON`: JSON file to use for the latency tests. Default value is empty string (use default file).
@@ -46,12 +48,14 @@ Runtime environment variables:
 - `REMOTE_PORT`: Port for the remote vLLM service to benchmark. Default value is empty string.
 
 Nightly benchmark will be triggered when:
+
 - Every commit for those PRs with `perf-benchmarks` label and `nightly-benchmarks` label.
 
 ## Performance benchmark details
 
 See [performance-benchmarks-descriptions.md](performance-benchmarks-descriptions.md) for detailed descriptions, and use `tests/latency-tests.json`, `tests/throughput-tests.json`, `tests/serving-tests.json` to configure the test cases.
 > NOTE: For Intel® Xeon® Processors, use `tests/latency-tests-cpu.json`, `tests/throughput-tests-cpu.json`, `tests/serving-tests-cpu.json` instead.
+>
 ### Latency test
 
 Here is an example of one test inside `latency-tests.json`:
@@ -149,6 +153,7 @@ Here is an example using the script to compare result_a and result_b without det
 
 Here is an example using the script to compare result_a and result_b with detail test name.
 `python3 compare-json-results.py -f results_a/benchmark_results.json -f results_b/benchmark_results.json`
+
 |   | results_a/benchmark_results.json_name | results_a/benchmark_results.json | results_b/benchmark_results.json_name | results_b/benchmark_results.json | perf_ratio        |
 |---|---------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|----------|
 | 0 | serving_llama8B_tp1_sharegpt_qps_1          | 142.633982                             | serving_llama8B_tp1_sharegpt_qps_1          | 156.526018                             | 1.097396 |

.buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/nightly-annotation.md

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+# Nightly benchmark annotation
 
 ## Description
 
@@ -13,15 +14,15 @@ Please download the visualization scripts in the post
 
 - Find the docker we use in `benchmarking pipeline`
 - Deploy the docker, and inside the docker:
-  - Download `nightly-benchmarks.zip`.
-  - In the same folder, run the following code:
+    - Download `nightly-benchmarks.zip`.
+    - In the same folder, run the following code:
 
-  ```bash
-  export HF_TOKEN=<your HF token>
-  apt update
-  apt install -y git
-  unzip nightly-benchmarks.zip
-  VLLM_SOURCE_CODE_LOC=./ bash .buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/scripts/run-nightly-benchmarks.sh
-  ```
+    ```bash
+    export HF_TOKEN=<your HF token>
+    apt update
+    apt install -y git
+    unzip nightly-benchmarks.zip
+    VLLM_SOURCE_CODE_LOC=./ bash .buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/scripts/run-nightly-benchmarks.sh
+    ```
 
 And the results will be inside `./benchmarks/results`.

.buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/nightly-descriptions.md

@@ -13,25 +13,25 @@ Latest reproduction guilde: [github issue link](https://github.com/vllm-project/
 ## Setup
 
 - Docker images:
-  - vLLM: `vllm/vllm-openai:v0.6.2`
-  - SGLang: `lmsysorg/sglang:v0.3.2-cu121`
-  - LMDeploy: `openmmlab/lmdeploy:v0.6.1-cu12`
-  - TensorRT-LLM: `nvcr.io/nvidia/tritonserver:24.07-trtllm-python-py3`
-    - *NOTE: we uses r24.07 as the current implementation only works for this version. We are going to bump this up.*
-  - Check [nightly-pipeline.yaml](nightly-pipeline.yaml) for the concrete docker images, specs and commands we use for the benchmark.
+    - vLLM: `vllm/vllm-openai:v0.6.2`
+    - SGLang: `lmsysorg/sglang:v0.3.2-cu121`
+    - LMDeploy: `openmmlab/lmdeploy:v0.6.1-cu12`
+    - TensorRT-LLM: `nvcr.io/nvidia/tritonserver:24.07-trtllm-python-py3`
+        - *NOTE: we uses r24.07 as the current implementation only works for this version. We are going to bump this up.*
+    - Check [nightly-pipeline.yaml](nightly-pipeline.yaml) for the concrete docker images, specs and commands we use for the benchmark.
 - Hardware
-  - 8x Nvidia A100 GPUs
+    - 8x Nvidia A100 GPUs
 - Workload:
-  - Dataset
-    - ShareGPT dataset
-    - Prefill-heavy dataset (in average 462 input tokens, 16 tokens as output)
-    - Decode-heavy dataset (in average 462 input tokens, 256 output tokens)
-    - Check [nightly-tests.json](tests/nightly-tests.json) for the concrete configuration of datasets we use.
-  - Models: llama-3 8B, llama-3 70B.
-    - We do not use llama 3.1 as it is incompatible with trt-llm r24.07. ([issue](https://github.com/NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM/issues/2105)).
-  - Average QPS (query per second): 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 and inf.
-    - Queries are randomly sampled, and arrival patterns are determined via Poisson process, but all with fixed random seed.
-  - Evaluation metrics: Throughput (higher the better), TTFT (time to the first token, lower the better), ITL (inter-token latency, lower the better).
+    - Dataset
+        - ShareGPT dataset
+        - Prefill-heavy dataset (in average 462 input tokens, 16 tokens as output)
+        - Decode-heavy dataset (in average 462 input tokens, 256 output tokens)
+        - Check [nightly-tests.json](tests/nightly-tests.json) for the concrete configuration of datasets we use.
+    - Models: llama-3 8B, llama-3 70B.
+        - We do not use llama 3.1 as it is incompatible with trt-llm r24.07. ([issue](https://github.com/NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM/issues/2105)).
+    - Average QPS (query per second): 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 and inf.
+        - Queries are randomly sampled, and arrival patterns are determined via Poisson process, but all with fixed random seed.
+    - Evaluation metrics: Throughput (higher the better), TTFT (time to the first token, lower the better), ITL (inter-token latency, lower the better).
 
 ## Known issues
 

.buildkite/nightly-benchmarks/performance-benchmarks-descriptions.md

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+# Performance benchmarks descriptions
 
 ## Latency tests