vLLM currently supports named function calling, as well as the `auto`, `required` (as of `vllm>=0.8.3`), and `none` options for the `tool_choice` field in the chat completion API.
Start the server with tool calling enabled. This example uses Meta's Llama 3.1 8B model, so we need to use the `llama3_json` tool calling chat template from the vLLM examples directory:
You can also specify a particular function using named function calling by setting `tool_choice={"type": "function", "function": {"name": "get_weather"}}`. Note that this will use the structured outputs backend - so the first time this is used, there will be several seconds of latency (or more) as the FSM is compiled for the first time before it is cached for subsequent requests.
vLLM supports named function calling in the chat completion API by default. This should work with most structured outputs backends supported by vLLM. You are guaranteed a validly-parsable function call - not a
vLLM will use structured outputs to ensure the response matches the tool parameter object defined by the JSON schema in the `tools` parameter.
For best results, we recommend ensuring that the expected output format / schema is specified in the prompt to ensure that the model's intended generation is aligned with the schema that it's being forced to generate by the structured outputs backend.
vLLM supports the `tool_choice='required'` option in the chat completion API. Similar to the named function calling, it also uses structured outputs, so this is enabled by default and will work with any supported model. However, support for alternative decoding backends are on the [roadmap](../usage/v1_guide.md#features) for the V1 engine.
When tool_choice='required' is set, the model is guaranteed to generate one or more tool calls based on the specified tool list in the `tools` parameter. The number of tool calls depends on the user's query. The output format strictly follows the schema defined in the `tools` parameter.
vLLM supports the `tool_choice='none'` option in the chat completion API. When this option is set, the model will not generate any tool calls and will respond with regular text content only, even if tools are defined in the request.
When tools are specified in the request, vLLM includes tool definitions in the prompt by default, regardless of the `tool_choice` setting. To exclude tool definitions when `tool_choice='none'`, use the `--exclude-tools-when-tool-choice-none` option.
*`--tool-parser-plugin` -- **optional** tool parser plugin used to register user defined tool parsers into vllm, the registered tool parser name can be specified in `--tool-call-parser`.
*`--chat-template` -- **optional** for auto tool choice. It's the path to the chat template which handles `tool`-role messages and `assistant`-role messages
that contain previously generated tool calls. Hermes, Mistral and Llama models have tool-compatible chat templates in their
`tokenizer_config.json` files, but you can specify a custom template. This argument can be set to `tool_use` if your model has a tool use-specific chat
template configured in the `tokenizer_config.json`. In this case, it will be used per the `transformers` specification. More on this [here](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/en/chat_templating#why-do-some-models-have-multiple-templates)
from HuggingFace; and you can find an example of this in a `tokenizer_config.json` [here](https://huggingface.co/NousResearch/Hermes-2-Pro-Llama-3-8B/blob/main/tokenizer_config.json).
2.**For Transformers tokenization backend only**: Mistral's `tokenizer_config.json` chat template requires tool call IDs that are exactly 9 digits, which is
The tool calling that is supported is the [JSON-based tool calling](https://llama.meta.com/docs/model-cards-and-prompt-formats/llama3_1/#json-based-tool-calling). For [pythonic tool calling](https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-models/blob/main/models/llama3_2/text_prompt_format.md#zero-shot-function-calling) introduced by the Llama-3.2 models, see the `pythonic` tool parser below. As for Llama 4 models, it is recommended to use the `llama4_pythonic` tool parser.
* <gh-file:examples/tool_chat_template_llama4_pythonic.jinja> - this is based on the [official chat template](https://www.llama.com/docs/model-cards-and-prompt-formats/llama4/) for the Llama 4 models.
<gh-file:examples/tool_chat_template_granite.jinja>: this is a modified chat template from the original on Hugging Face. Parallel function calls are supported.
<gh-file:examples/tool_chat_template_granite_20b_fc.jinja>: this is a modified chat template from the original on Hugging Face, which is not vLLM-compatible. It blends function description elements from the Hermes template and follows the same system prompt as "Response Generation" mode from [the paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.00121). Parallel function calls are supported.
The xLAM tool parser is designed to support models that generate tool calls in various JSON formats. It detects function calls in several different output styles:
1. Direct JSON arrays: Output strings that are JSON arrays starting with `[` and ending with `]`
2. Thinking tags: Using `<think>...</think>` tags containing JSON arrays
3. Code blocks: JSON in code blocks (```json ...```)
4. Tool calls tags: Using `[TOOL_CALLS]` or `<tool_call>...</tool_call>` tags
Parallel function calls are supported, and the parser can effectively separate text content from tool calls.
For Qwen2.5, the chat template in tokenizer_config.json has already included support for the Hermes-style tool use. Therefore, you can use the `hermes` parser to enable tool calls for Qwen models. For more detailed information, please refer to the official [Qwen documentation](https://qwen.readthedocs.io/en/latest/framework/function_call.html#vllm)
Olmo 3 models output tool calls in a format that is very similar to the one expected by the `pythonic` parser (see below), with a few differences. Each tool call is a pythonic string, but the parallel tool calls are newline-delimited, and the calls are wrapped within XML tags as `<function_calls>..</function_calls>`. In addition, the parser also allows JSON boolean and null literals (`true`, `false`, and `null`) in addition to the pythonic ones (`True`, `False`, and `None`).
A growing number of models output a python list to represent tool calls instead of using JSON. This has the advantage of inherently supporting parallel tool calls and removing ambiguity around the JSON schema required for tool calls. The `pythonic` tool parser can support such models.
As a concrete example, these models may look up the weather in San Francisco and Seattle by generating:
* The model must not generate both text and tool calls in the same generation. This may not be hard to change for a specific model, but the community currently lacks consensus on which tokens to emit when starting and ending tool calls. (In particular, the Llama 3.2 models emit no such tokens.)
* Llama's smaller models struggle to use tools effectively.
A tool parser plugin is a Python file containing one or more ToolParser implementations. You can write a ToolParser similar to the `Hermes2ProToolParser` in <gh-file:vllm/entrypoints/openai/tool_parsers/hermes_tool_parser.py>.
