- Performance benchmark: benchmark vllm's performance under various workload, for **developers** to gain clarity on whether their PR improves/degrades vllm's performance
- Nightly benchmark: compare vllm's performance against alternatives (tgi, trt-llm and lmdeploy), for **the public** to know when to choose vllm.
See [vLLM performance dashboard](https://hud.pytorch.org/benchmark/llms?repoName=vllm-project%2Fvllm) for the latest performance benchmark results and [vLLM GitHub README](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/main/README.md) for latest nightly benchmark results.
**Benchmarking Coverage**: latency, throughput and fix-qps serving on A100 (the support for FP8 benchmark on H100 is coming!) and Intel® Xeon® Processors, with different models.
See [performance-benchmarks-descriptions.md](performance-benchmarks-descriptions.md) for detailed descriptions, and use `tests/latency-tests.json`, `tests/throughput-tests.json`, `tests/serving-tests.json` to configure the test cases.
- The `parameters` attribute control the command line arguments to be used for `vllm bench latency`. Note that please use underline `_` instead of the dash `-` when specifying the command line arguments, and `run-performance-benchmarks.sh` will convert the underline to dash when feeding the arguments to `vllm bench latency`. For example, the corresponding command line arguments for `vllm bench latency` will be `--model meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-8B --tensor-parallel-size 1 --load-format dummy --num-iters-warmup 5 --num-iters 15`
The tests are specified in `throughput-tests.json`. The syntax is similar to `latency-tests.json`, except for that the parameters will be fed forward to `vllm bench throughput`.
We test the throughput by using `vllm bench serve` with request rate = inf to cover the online serving overhead. The corresponding parameters are in `serving-tests.json`, and here is an example:
The number of this test is less stable compared to the delay and latency benchmarks (due to randomized sharegpt dataset sampling inside `benchmark_serving.py`), but a large change on this number (e.g. 5% change) still vary the output greatly.
WARNING: The benchmarking script will save json results by itself, so please do not configure `--save-results` or other results-saving-related parameters in `serving-tests.json`.
The `convert-results-json-to-markdown.py` helps you put the benchmarking results inside a markdown table, by formatting [descriptions.md](performance-benchmarks-descriptions.md) with real benchmarking results.
`compare-json-results.py` compares two `benchmark_results.json` files and provides performance ratio e.g. for Output Tput, Median TTFT and Median TPOT.
If only one benchmark_results.json is passed, `compare-json-results.py` compares different TP and PP configurations in the benchmark_results.json instead.
| | Model | Dataset Name | Input Len | Output Len | # of max concurrency | qps | results_a/benchmark_results.json | results_b/benchmark_results.json | perf_ratio |
See [nightly-descriptions.md](nightly-descriptions.md) for the detailed description on test workload, models and docker containers of benchmarking other llm engines.
- Inside each container, we run [scripts/run-nightly-benchmarks.sh](scripts/run-nightly-benchmarks.sh), which will probe the serving engine of the current container.
- The `scripts/run-nightly-benchmarks.sh` will parse the workload described in [nightly-tests.json](tests/nightly-tests.json) and launch the right benchmark for the specified serving engine via `scripts/launch-server.sh`.
- At last, we run [scripts/summary-nightly-results.py](scripts/summary-nightly-results.py) to collect and plot the final benchmarking results, and update the results to buildkite.
In [nightly-tests.json](tests/nightly-tests.json), we include the command line arguments for benchmarking commands, together with the benchmarking test cases. The format is highly similar to performance benchmark.
WARNING: the docker versions are HARD-CODED and SHOULD BE ALIGNED WITH `nightly-descriptions.md`. The docker versions need to be hard-coded as there are several version-specific bug fixes inside `scripts/run-nightly-benchmarks.sh` and `scripts/launch-server.sh`.
WARNING: populating `trt-llm` to latest version is not easy, as it requires updating several protobuf files in [tensorrt-demo](https://github.com/neuralmagic/tensorrt-demo.git).